In Vitro Microleakage and Fracture Resistance of "Infinity Edge" and Cusp Reduction Preparation Designs for Moderate-sized Class II Composites.

AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the marginal microleakage and maximum occlusal fracture loads and fracture modes of two novel class II preparation designs, "infinity edge" and the "2.5 mm cusp reduction" preparations as compared to a traditional class II preparation without cuspal involvement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty extracted human mandibular molars were prepared for moderate-sized class II restorations with extensions into all occlusal grooves. Of these, ten class II preparations served as control. Ten were modified for a 2.5 mm even reduction of the cusps adjacent to the interproximal box. An additional 10 preparations were modified with an "infinity edge" bevel on the interproximal and occlusal portions. All teeth were restored utilizing a flowable bulk-fill composite in the apical portion of the interproximal box and 2-4 mm of heated bulk-fill composite in one increment for the remainder. All groups were cyclic loaded and thermocycled, then imaged with microcomputed tomography (µCT) before and after infiltration with a silver nitrate solution. Images were subtracted to obtain volumetric measurements of microleakage and reported as a percentage of the total volume from the apical extent of the proximal box. All groups were loaded to failure and fracture load and mode were recorded. RESULTS: No significant differences were found in microleakage volume as a percentage of total tooth volume; however, the "infinity edge" group had significantly greater microleakage in the proximal box compared to the traditional class II group. No significant differences were found in fracture load or mode between the groups. CONCLUSION: Traditional class II, 2.5 mm cuspal reduction, and "infinity edge" preparation designs have similar fracture loads as well as volumes of microleakage; however, an "infinity edge" preparation has a higher ratio of microleakage in the proximal box. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Clinicians should carefully consider the use of "infinity edge" margins, particularly on dentin in the apical extent of the proximal box. How to cite this article: Watson JC, Lien W, Raimondi JC, et al. In Vitro Microleakage and Fracture Resistance of "Infinity Edge" and Cusp Reduction Preparation Designs for Moderate-sized Class II Composites. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(1):3-9.

Accuracy of an intraoral scanner based on sleeve type, decontamination, and calibration.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an intraoral scanner based on camera sleeve type, decontamination protocol, and calibration status. Five extracted human teeth were set into a gypsum stone model and prepared for various indirect restorations. An optical impression was completed with a benchtop scanner to serve as a reference standard. A total of 160 optical impressions were completed using a sterilizable sleeve, an autoclavable sleeve with a single-use plastic window, or a single-use disposable plastic sleeve attached to a calibrated or an uncalibrated intraoral scanner. For the sterilizable sleeves, 2 decontamination protocols were used--high-level disinfection (HLD) or dry heat sterilization (DHS)--and scans were performed at baseline and after 25 and 50 cycles for each protocol. For the autoclavable (AS) and disposable single-use (SU) sleeves, scans were performed at baseline only. Thus, there were 10 optical impressions per test condition: sleeve type (HLD, DHS, AS, or SU) × decontamination status (baseline, 25 cycles [HLD or DHS], or 50 cycles [HLD or DHS]) × calibration status (calibrated or uncalibrated scanner). The individual optical impressions were compared to the reference standard impression by using 3-dimensional best-fit superimposition with the prepared tooth surfaces as reference points, and 3-dimensional linear differences were calculated for each superimposition. The median positive and absolute value median negative distance measurements were averaged for each impression to generate an average median discrepancy from baseline. The data were analyzed with Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests (α = 0.05). No statistically significant differences in the median linear distance were found, regardless of sleeve type, decontamination protocol, or calibration status (P > 0.05). All groups demonstrated statistically similar linear disparities, ranging from 11.78 to 14.00 µm. The most precise sleeves were the single-use plastic sleeves, although their results were not significantly different from those of the multiuse sleeve. The results indicated that any of the currently available camera sleeves can provide similar accuracy in a clinical setting and that single-use disposable sleeves are a viable alternative to the currently accepted multiuse sleeves.

Management of dental anxiety via distraction technique.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of a stress ball as a distraction technique on stress levels of patients undergoing a dental procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A randomized, split-mouth design was conducted using 20 adult subjects requiring scaling and root planing (Sc/RP) in all four quadrants. Each side of the mouth (maxillary/mandibular) received Sc/RP with local anesthetic with or without the use of a stress-ball distraction over two separate sessions. Subjects completed two pre-procedural questionnaires (Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, STAI; Modified Dental Anxiety Scale, MDAS) before and after each treatment session. A Galvanic Skin Response (GSR) sensor (Neulog) was used throughout each session to measure skin conductance or sweat. RESULTS: No significant difference in GSR scores was found during treatment with or without the use of the stress ball. Also, no significant differences in the change in STAI or MDAS scores were found with or without the use of a stress ball. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study found that the use of a stress ball as a distraction technique did not result in any significant reduction in stress levels in subjects undergoing scaling and root planing with local anesthesia. Key words:Anxiety, distraction, stress ball.

Bond strength of dual-cured resin cement used with dual-cured adhesives.

The reported advantage of new dual-cured adhesive agents is that they do not require light curing, resulting in a reduced film thickness and improved seating of bonded all-ceramic restorations. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of dual-cured adhesives on the bond strength of dual-cured resin cement to dentin under different polymerization conditions: with or without light curing of the dual-cured adhesive as well as with or without light curing of the dual-cured resin cement through a lithium disilicate ceramic material. Human molars were sectioned to remove the coronal tooth structure and randomly divided into 3 adhesive groups: Clearfil SE Bond 2, ExciTE F DSC, and Universal Primer. The adhesive agents were applied to the dentin surface with or without light activation. A dual-cured resin cement was applied, and discs of lithium disilicate were cemented to the dentin surface. Half of the discs were light cured from the top surface, and the other half were allowed to self-cure. Shear bond strength was tested after storage in distilled water for 24 hours. The effect of light curing of the adhesive or cement on the shear bond strength of the lithium disilicate discs to dentin was product dependent. Clearfil SE Bond 2 performed significantly better with light curing of both the adhesive and cement. Less significant effects of the various light-curing and self-curing combinations were observed with ExciTE F DSC or Universal Primer. When neither the adhesive nor the cement was light cured, all 3 adhesives performed poorly and had a significant loss in bond strength.

Efficacy of Pulpal Anesthesia Using a Needle-less Syringe.

The purpose of this study was to investigate the manufacturer's claims regarding a novel needleless intraligamentary local anesthesia injection device (Numbee, BioDent) to provide effective single tooth anesthesia. Investigators compared the Numbee with a traditional inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) during a restorative procedure on mandibular teeth. A randomized, split-mouth design was conducted with 15 adult subjects receiving an IANB on one side and a Numbee injection on the same tooth type on the contralateral side. Subjects recorded injection pain using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and their preferred injection technique. Anesthesia was considered profound with 2 consecutive electric pulp tester readings of 80. If subjects became symptomatic during the restorative procedure, rescue anesthesia was administered. The difference in VAS scores for injection pain between the Numbee and the IANB was not significant (p = .078). For the IANB, the incidence of profound anesthesia was 46%, and required rescue anesthesia was 20%. For the Numbee, the incidence of profound anesthesia was 0%, and required rescue anesthesia was 60%. Subject preference was evenly split (50/50%) between the 2 techniques. The IANB outperformed the Numbee device for achieving profound anesthesia and requiring less rescue anesthesia.

Fracture resistance of bonded CAD/CAM restorations with standard or extended preparations.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the fracture resistance of teeth with standard or extended mesio-occlusodistal (MOD) preparations after restoration with bonded computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials. Standard or extended MOD cavities were prepared in 60 of 70 extracted, caries-free third molars. In the standard MOD preparations (n = 30), 4.5- mm buccal and lingual/palatal wall thickness remained, and proximal boxes extended 1.0 mm coronal to the cementoenamel junction. In the extended MOD preparations (n = 30), the buccal and lingual/palatal walls were reduced to a thickness of 3.0 mm. A CAD/CAM acquisition unit was used to scan 20 standard and 20 extended preparations. Subsequently, 10 standard and 10 extended preparations were restored with milled lithium disilicate, and 10 of each type were restored with resin nanoceramic. Ten of each preparation type were left unrestored (negative control). An additional 10 third molars were neither prepared nor restored (positive control). After thermocycling and cyclic loading, specimens were fractured in a material testing device. Although bonded CAD/CAM restorations reinforced the tooth structure, the mean fracture loads were significantly lower (P < 0.05) in teeth with restored extended preparations (2642.4 [SD 479.4] N) than in teeth with restored standard preparations (3376.6 [SD 817.9] N). The type of CAD/CAM restorative material did not significantly affect the fracture load. Practitioners should consider covering the cusps with a CAD/CAM restorative material to reduce the potential for fracture in preparations with reduced cuspal thickness, especially in patients with heavier occlusion or functional loads.